On 27 Sep 2004, at 11:14, Jeroen Massar wrote:
As a "Director" (of what that may be) you probably also know of these
papers called 'contracts'. Thus make sure you have that sort of stuff in
your contract.
Regardless, there are circumstances where IPv4 renumbering is necessary, and hence the original point (that there is practical application for a NAT with non-private-use addresses on both sides) is a valid and reasonable one.
Many small hosting companies who do not provide access do not qualify for PI allocations from some RIRs, for example, and for them renumbering is required every time they change provider.
Joe
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf