Thank you Brian for addressing my comment.
Regards,
Giuseppe
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 8:49 PM
To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@xxxxxxxxxx>; ops-dir@xxxxxxxx
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-addr-assign.all@xxxxxxxx; ipv6@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-addr-assign-02
Thanks Giuseppe, we will follow up.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 12-Mar-25 22:55, Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Giuseppe Fioccola
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> This document proposes to change the approval level of IPv6 address
> allocations by complying with the "IETF Review" process, defined by
> BCP 26. It is also mentioned the experience with RFC 9602, which
> already followed this process. I think that the document has a well
> defined scope and explains the reasons clearly. I was wondering about
> the IANA feedback, since the current IANA review state is Not OK. But,
> after reading the Intdir telechat review, I realized that IANA is OK
> with the requested action. I only noticed this nit and I suggest to ask IANA to review the state and fix it in order to avoid any confusion.
>
>
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
