Thank you Brian for addressing my comment. Regards, Giuseppe -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2025 8:49 PM To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@xxxxxxxxxx>; ops-dir@xxxxxxxx Cc: draft-ietf-6man-addr-assign.all@xxxxxxxx; ipv6@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-addr-assign-02 Thanks Giuseppe, we will follow up. Regards Brian Carpenter On 12-Mar-25 22:55, Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Giuseppe Fioccola > Review result: Has Nits > > This document proposes to change the approval level of IPv6 address > allocations by complying with the "IETF Review" process, defined by > BCP 26. It is also mentioned the experience with RFC 9602, which > already followed this process. I think that the document has a well > defined scope and explains the reasons clearly. I was wondering about > the IANA feedback, since the current IANA review state is Not OK. But, > after reading the Intdir telechat review, I realized that IANA is OK > with the requested action. I only noticed this nit and I suggest to ask IANA to review the state and fix it in order to avoid any confusion. > > -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx