I agree completely with Bob. I want to point out one issue where vigilance will be important: On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 12:39:53PM -0700, Bob Hinden allegedly wrote: > Housing the IETF administrative activity in ISOC seems to me to be a > much simpler solution to our administrative problems and will require > much less work to get it set up. I am concerned that the independent > approach will take considerably more cycles and work from the IETF > leadership to get it set up and functioning. This will take away from > working on what I consider to be more important problems. I agree in principle but part of what got us into this situation was the feeling that we could just let ISOC (and/or CNRI) just take care of the non-technical details. Let's avoid even leaning that way this time. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf