Reviewer: Thomas Fossati Review result: Ready with Nits Thank you editors for taking into consideration the feedback in my early review, specifically: 1. Clarifying the minimal requirements in 7228(bis) terms for the top-level manifest processor; 2. Adding the dependent manifest in example "0". One remaining nit is that some of the examples contain very long lines. This can be easily fixed using Carsten’s excellent tooling, which provides `:include-fold` (instead of `:include`) to deal with such situations. cheers! -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
