Hi Vincent,
Thanks for the review and sorry for the late reply. I've uploaded version -25 to address your comments. Detailed answers below inline.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 3:51 AM Vincent Roca via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Vincent Roca
Review result: Has Nits
Hello,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
Summary: has nits
The security considerations section follows the usual guidelines for YANG modules.
However, I have two comments:
- the last sentence of the 3rd paragraph:
"These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:"
suggests that the sensitivity and vulnerability of the 4 data nodes be discussed.
Yet I see nothing.
[Yingzhen]: Thanks for catching these. I've added some text, hopefully it addresses your concern.
-- the sentence:
"And the augmentations to the ISIS link state database."
is incomplete.
[Yingzhen]: "And the augmentations to the ISIS link state database." goes with the five read-only nodes above it. It means all the new TLVs added to the ISIS link state database as there are many of them.
Regards,
Vincent
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
