(apologies for an early send)
Hi Giuseppe,
Thank you very much for your review! Responses below.
On 2/3/25 16:23, Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker wrote:
I think that Appendix A on "Efficiency and Convergence Issues in DNS Scanning"
is quite relevant to understand the use cases that this document aims to
address, and therefore, it could be moved earlier in this document, e.g. as a
subsection of the Introduction.
Appendix A indeed could be moved into the body of the document; however, as there have been arguments both ways and the WG ended up settling on the current location, we recommend leaving it as it is.
I would add a sentence at the beginning of section 2 on "DSYNC RR Type" just to
introduce what is defined in this section, i.e. a new RR TYPE for endpoint
discovery.
Done.
NEW
This section defines the DSYNC RR type which is subsequently used for
discovering notification endpoints.
From an OPSDIR point of view, I noticed that some references about the
deployment are provided in section 7 on "Implementation Status". Since this
section is supposed to be removed before publication, I would rather keep it
and summarize the main results of the implementation especially with regards to
interoperability and backwards compatibility aspects.
To prevent implementation-specific text from not aging well, we could replace Section 7 with something like:
At least on open source implementation already exist and at least one
TLD registry is currently implementing this as an upcoming service.
However, it's unclear where that text could live (it hardly justifies its own section), or whether it would even address your concern. The authors would appreciate your suggestion.
Thanks,
Peter + co-authors
--
https://desec.io/
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
