Hi David, Thanks a lot for the review and suggestion. draft-hr-spring-intentaware-routing-using-color has just been updated recently. To my understanding draft-hr is a joint effort on describing the use cases and requirements for intent-aware routing, it has been referenced by several intent-aware routing solution documents. Thus we think it is a useful informative reference for readers of the CPR draft. The citation to draft-hr in the operational considerations was just to provide some background information on operator's choices of intent-aware routing mechanisms. It does not provide guidance to the operation of the CPR mechanism. With the above consideration, the authors believe it is better to keep the reference as is. Best regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: David Black via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2025 5:45 AM > To: tsv-art@xxxxxxxx > Cc: draft-ietf-idr-cpr.all@xxxxxxxx; idr@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; > david.black@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-cpr-06 > > Reviewer: David Black > Review result: Ready with Nits > > This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's > ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written > primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's > authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the > IETF discussion list for information. > > When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this > review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC > tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review. > > This document describes how to advertise colored IPv6 prefixes for SRv6 via > BGP. As a routing protocol document that extends BGP, this document does > not raise any transport-specific concerns. > > I noticed one nit - this draft has a strong dependence on > draft-hr-spring-intentaware-routing-using-color, which is an Expired > Internet-Draft. That draft is cited as the source of requirements and > problem statement for this draft, and that draft is cited twice in the > Operational Considerations section as a foundation for guidance to operators. > I strongly encourage the authors to find a better reference for these purposes > than an expired Internet-Draft and/or include more material on these topics > in the absence of an equally useful reference. > > -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
