Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready I don't object to this document being published as an Informational RFC, but I have some observations for the group and the IESG to consider. It's really not clear _why_ this document is being published as an Informational RFC, Perhaps this, along with the -inter- document could be taken together and then used to refine the group's charter text rather than publishing them as separate RFCs? It's hard to believe that the gap analysis here is _complete_. Rather, I think it's trying to identify a set of problems for which there is consensus to do some engineering work around. If it will help make the Internet better to publish this document to help steer the group to appropriate technical work, then do so. But consider making it clearer what its purpose is. (As this is an art-art review, I'll note explicitly that there are no ART specific considerations to vet in this document). -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
