Hi Henning, Thanks much for the review. > On Jan 10, 2025, at 07:42, Henning Rogge via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Henning Rogge > Review result: Ready > > Hi, > > I have been asked to review draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-prefix-extended-flags, which I > hereby do for draft 03. > > I think the document is easy to understand and well written. Providing more > limited sized bitfields for flags is futile, so providing a mechanism that > gives OSPF an arbitrary amount of bits should solve this issue. > > The text covers all things I could think about... I am unsure how multiple of > these TLVs could be put into the same message (except for a bugged > implementation), but its a good idea to exactly specify which one must be > parsed. It would be a bug but OSPF documents typically specify how the case should be handled. Thanks, Acee > > Henning Rogge > > > -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
