Hi Greg,
GIM>> Thank you for the question, Tony. Looking at other Geneve OAM documents, I propose the following update: OLD TEXT: The second case is when a test packet is transmitted using the VNI value associated with the monitored service flow. By doing that, the test packet experiences network treatment as the tenant's packets. Details of that use case are outside the scope of this specification. NEW TEXT: The second case is when a test packet is transmitted using the VNI value associated with the monitored service flow. By doing that, the test packet experiences network treatment as the tenant's packets. An example of the realization of that scenario is discussed in [RFC9521]. And I now have a question for you Should RFC 9521 be used as Normative reference or it can remain the Informative?
Thank you. I think informative is fine.
T
|
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
