Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Bernie Volz <bevolz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for the review and weâ??ll look to address your nits in a future > > revision (after IETF last-call ends). > > Now at: > https://github.com/dhcwg/rfc8415bis/pull/14 If I read that pull request correctly, the new text for one item is: <li>The following errata for RFC 8415 were incorporated: Erratum IDs 6159 and 6183. Note that Erratum ID 6269 was no longer applicable after the Server Unicast Option was obsoleted. Note that erratum 6159 is also no longer applicable now that temporary addresses have been obsoleted. Indeed, the section (6.5) that erratum 6159 corrects has been deleted. The text "... were incorporated: Erratum IDs 6159 and 6183." seems incongruous: 6269 was not "incorporated" apparently because "6269 was no longer applicable after ...". But "6159 is also no longer applicable now that ..." but it *is* "incorporated". It seems like either (1) all three errata should be listed as "incorporated", with two of them incorporated as null changes, on the grounds that they are all now resolved vis-a-vis the RFC that is in force, or (2) one erratum should be listed as "incorporated" because it causes non-null changes to the RFC and two errata should be listed as "no longer applicable". Dale
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
