Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-17 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 2024-12-19 IETF LC End Date: 2024-12-17 IESG Telechat date: 2025-02-06 Summary: I have no technical comments or questions. However, I do have one editorial question/comment that I'd like the authors to address. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: The "Flex-Algorithm" is used throughout the document, and Section 1 contains the following sentence: "A Flex-Algorithm [RFC9350] is defined as a set of parameters consisting of calculation-type, metric-type, and a set of constraints to allow operators to have more control over the network path computation." Is this correct? Isn't that the definition for FAD? Flex-Algorithm is just a numeric identifier. "In this document, we define further extensions to Flex-Algorithm that will allow operators additional control over their traffic flows, especially with respect to bandwidth constraints." Similar to the previous comment, in what way is Flex-Algorithm extended, assuming it is just an identifier? -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
