or to use terminology we have used for a long time "RFC has been obsoleted" Scott > On Dec 18, 2024, at 1:33 PM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ps - maybe sleep can make it more explicit: > > Change from > Historic > To > RFC is historic > > That makes it clear it is the RFC not the protocol. > > Joe > — > Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist > www.strayalpha.com > >> On Dec 18, 2024, at 10:31 AM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I provided the IESG text that specifically says to not do this for protocols will in use, ie to leave them as obsoleted. >> >> Joe >> — >> Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist >> www.strayalpha.com >> >>> On Dec 18, 2024, at 8:44 AM, Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Importantly, I haven't heard anyone say there is a downside to moving these things to "HISTORIC" status. Let's just do it please. >>> pr >>> > -- > last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
