[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: Moving RFCs 793, 1065, 1723 and 1725 to Historic

[Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

s/sleep/we/

—

Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist

www.strayalpha.com

On Dec 18, 2024, at 10:33 AM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ps - maybe sleep can make it more explicit:

Change from

     Historic

To

     RFC is historic 

That makes it clear it is the RFC not the protocol. 

Joe

—

Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist

www.strayalpha.com

On Dec 18, 2024, at 10:31 AM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I provided the IESG text that specifically says to not do this for protocols will in use, ie to leave them as obsoleted. 

Joe

—

Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist

www.strayalpha.com

On Dec 18, 2024, at 8:44 AM, Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Importantly, I haven't heard anyone say there is a downside to moving these things to "HISTORIC" status. Let's just do it please.

pr

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx