+1
Maybe "inactive" rather than "expired" or "unsupported"?
/bill
On 2024-12-11 6:07 p.m., Joel Halpern wrote:
If we could easily make small changes, I could live with changing
"expires" to "unsupported". I like the fact that drafts fall off
working group indices when they are more than 6 months old with change.
I grant that they don't really expire, and that claiming they do so can
confuse some people. Having said that, we seem to be unable to agree on
even small thigns :-)
Yours,
Joel
On 12/11/2024 5:55 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 2:25 PM Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rob Sayre wrote on 11/12/2024 22:00:
> I find the "expiration" (does not expire, it can just be on GitHub)
> policy to be something that concerns overly officious people.
