[Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-ari-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Michael Tüxen
Review result: Ready with Issues

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@xxxxxxxx if you reply to or forward this review.

The sixth step in the algorithm described in Section 4.2 is ambiguous in my
view:

Otherwise, sleep until the Retry-After period has passed, or until the next
normal wake time, and return to Step 1.

Assume the Retry-After period is 6 hours (21600 seconds) as stated in the
example and assume that the normal wake time is 1 second. Depending on how the
sixth rule is interpreted, the client might retry in 6 hours or in one second.
Choosing the 1 second results in sending 21600 requests in 6 hours instead of
one. Therefore I think it makes sense to be more specific here such that you
send only one request...

There is one typo in Section 4.2:
regulatory enviornment -> regulatory environment


-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux