[Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-acme-onion-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Use short-lived certificates
> 
> This doesn't make sense to me. A short lived cert will be permanently logged in CT.
> In fact using shorter certs means more entries for the onion service in the CT log - making it easier, not harder, to find.

The assumption is that the information being logged might change, so it limits the exposure, but maybe that’s not valid.

> > Use a separate domain/key pair
> 
> This goes counter to the whole idea of a PKI. Using a cert for a.onion on b.onion asserts very little useful.

Well, this is onion we’re discussing here, but point taken.  :-)

> > CT Exemption Advocacy
> 
> I don't think an RFC is the place to advocate for changes in a different organization, but otherwise agreed.
> 
> I will incorporate the rest of your comments as appropriate.

Regards,

Derrell



-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux