[Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl Wallace via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2024 4:37 PM
> To: secdir@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx;
> regext@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-
> 08
>
> Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
>
> Reviewer: Carl Wallace
> Review result: Ready
>
> This draft describes best current practices and proposes new potential
> practices to delete domain and host objects that reduce the risk of DNS
> resolution failure and maintain client-server data consistency when using the
> Extensible Provisioning Protocol. The draft is well written and references
> several helpful documents. One minor issue I had with the draft is that it
> becomes a wall of benefits and detriments, most of which are repetitious. This
> occurs in Section 5. I think that presentation is OK, but it may benefit from a
> shorter summary presentation in Section 6 of at least the MUST NOT
> practices.
> At present, only the MUST practices are highlighted in Section 6.

[SAH] Thanks for the review, Carl. Ultimately, the practices not mentioned in Section 6 are NOT RECOMMENDED. We can make that clear by saying so explicitly.

Scott
-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux