[Last-Call] Re: Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-23

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you.

I've updated the text to "TXT record".

-- 
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Di Ma via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 8:28 AM
> To: dnsdir@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: dmarc@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting.all@xxxxxxxx; last-
> call@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-23
> 
> Reviewer: Di Ma
> Review result: Ready
> 
> This draft specifies an associated mechanism to fulfill the DMARC functionality
> (draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-36). What it standardizes is within the framework of
> DMARC, hence brings no extra extension to DNS. I think it is ready from DNS
> perspective.
> 
> And I have an editorial comment for the authors. In this document, “TXT resource
> record”, “TXT record” and “TXT” are used respectively in different places,
> referring to the same concept. I think they should be normalized into one item.
> 

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux