Thank you. I've updated the text to "TXT record". -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -----Original Message----- > From: Di Ma via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 8:28 AM > To: dnsdir@xxxxxxxx > Cc: dmarc@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting.all@xxxxxxxx; last- > call@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-23 > > Reviewer: Di Ma > Review result: Ready > > This draft specifies an associated mechanism to fulfill the DMARC functionality > (draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-36). What it standardizes is within the framework of > DMARC, hence brings no extra extension to DNS. I think it is ready from DNS > perspective. > > And I have an editorial comment for the authors. In this document, “TXT resource > record”, “TXT record” and “TXT” are used respectively in different places, > referring to the same concept. I think they should be normalized into one item. > -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx