Re: [Alldispatch] Re: [121attendees] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Alldispatch] Re: [121attendees] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:16:34 -0500
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx, alldispatch@xxxxxxxx, 121attendees@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <32C11636-F578-494B-A35C-FB23939487C9@mnot.net>
References: <32C11636-F578-494B-A35C-FB23939487C9@mnot.net>

On Nov 26, 2024, at 23:32, Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> GENDISPATCH never had a conflict-free slot before, and it was fine.

It was not. Gendispatch and IABopen had always been conflicted for me (even before being an AD)

Paul

References:
- Re: [121attendees] [Alldispatch] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)
  - From: Mark Nottingham

Prev by Date: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-35
Next by Date: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-17
Previous by thread: Re: [Alldispatch] Re: [121attendees] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)
Next by thread: Re: [121attendees] Re: [Alldispatch] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux