Re: [Alldispatch] Results of the ALLDISPATCH Experiment (Was: Results and report of the IETF 121 post-meeting survey)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 26/11/2024 21:58, Pete Resnick wrote:
Someone tell me why I'm wrong.

Because dispatch sessions are being used to add more hoops through
which people need jump.

Person: "Hi WG, I have this idea..."

Chair: "Not sure, goto dispatch"

Dispatch: "Not sure, have a BoF"

BoF: "You should goto WG"

Person: "That's were I started but the chairs bottled it
and pushed me to go all around the dispatch world just to
get back here again."

I've seen stuff like that happen. We're doing too much of
this dispatching and making some obvious things harder and
take longer. (Where the obvious answer might be yes/no/BoF/
etc. or "This WG will take it on, if other-WG doesn't have
a problem")

The only times where dispatching is needed is in the rare
case when it's not obvious how to get the answer referred
to above. (That does not mean the actual answer is obvious
but that how to get the answer is obvious.)

Cheers,
S.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux