Reviewer: Jiankang Yao Review result: Almost Ready Reviewer: Jiankang Yao Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned ART-ART reviewer for this draft. The Art Area Review Team (ART-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document: draft-ietf-regext-epp-delete-bcp-08 Reviewer: Jiankang Yao Review Date: 2024-11-26 Summary: Almost Ready for publication. This document describes a very important topic. The whole document is ok. One suggestion: Based on the title "Best Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", this document is supposed to outline current best practices and proposes the best approaches for deleting domain and host objects to minimize the risk of DNS resolution failure and ensure data consistency between clients and servers. But the main part of this document is section 5 "Analysis of Practices for Domain and Host Object Deletion", including many sub-sections "Practice Benefits" and "Practice Detriments". Only small section 6 "Recommendations" seems to describe the best practices. This arrangement causes me some confusion. How about renaming the title to something such as "Analysis and Recommendation of Practices for Deletion of Domain and Host Objects in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)"? I think that it will help to make the title and content more cohesive. Best Regards Jiankang Yao -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
