Hi Elwyn, Thanks for your review. We are looking into going with the Independent Submission Stream. FNV was expanded on first use in the Abstract but not in the Introduction. We will fix that. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 1:02 PM Elwyn Davies via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review result: Not Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-eastlake-fnv-29 > > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review Date: 2024-10-18 > IETF LC End Date: 2024-10-22 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: Not ready. I agree with the view in Barry Leiba's ARTART review that > this should be an independent stream document. I have not made any attempt to > review the code and algorithms in the document, the algorithms being outside my > areas of expertise. I understand that they reflect established practice. > > Otherwise it appears to be a sound exposition of the virtues and limitations of > the algorithm, but may need some additional description of problems that have > been encountered during usage. The algorithm has been around for something like > 10 years and it may no longer be the optimum solution to the problem areas that > it addresses. > > Major issues: > Intended document status should be a publication in Independent Stream. > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > s1: FNV should be expanded on > > -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
