[Last-Call] Re: [Tsv-art] Re: Re: Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Zahed,

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:54:21PM +0200, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 22:28, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On 10/17/24 20:46, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> > 
> > >   It's just doing IP forwarding.
> >
> > You've said that a few times and I find it a little confusing.
> >
> > "Just IP forwarding" to me would not include replying to the sender
> > of a BFD echo packet. ICMP yes, but I don't think BFD is a built-in
> > part of an IP stack in general and "just forwarding" would in general
> > be driven by rules wrt. the packet destination and not source.
> >
> > I wonder what I'm missing?
> 
> I would also like to understand this. One of my ballot comment is
> related to this. This specification says the loop-back device doesn’t
> need to support BFD, does this mean it can be any IP forwarder? I
> think the answer should be yes.

Exactly.

Best regards,
Erik

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux