Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-pals-ple-08 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2024-10-11 IETF LC End Date: 2024-10-23 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: Section 5.2.1 defining the PLEA Control Word describes two pairs of bits, one pair called RSSV and described in the usual way for describing reserved bits. A second pair is called FRG and is described more teresely but appears to be simply more reserved bits. It is unclear why these two fields are separated, and why the wording is slightly different between them. Section 6 desccribes the basic payload and the byte aligned payload. The description makes it look like there are two different forms. Thinking about it, the payload is always in bytes, so the sender will fill bits from the source until it has filled the fixed number of bytes. SO what is the difference between 6.1 and 6.2? -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
