re: I-D submission tool draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, September 13, 2004 08:38:45 -0400 scott bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I will say that I'm not fond of the idea of requiring that WG chairs
pre-approve the submission of -00 WG IDs, as a WG chair I'd rather be
able to enforce me getting a chance to review the document first - I'm
fine with letting a WG chair be able to pre approve but I do not think
it should be the only way that the process should be able to work

I agree. While both submission of the document and approval by the chair are necessary, there's no reason to require a particular order. If I'm not available to approve a new document (say, because I'm on a train returning from an IETF meeting), the system should wait until I can deal. It should _not_ force the submitter to wait -- computers are much better at waiting than people are.


-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <jhutz+@xxxxxxx>
  Sr. Research Systems Programmer
  School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility
  Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA


_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]