[Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hiya,

On 10/9/24 07:41, xiao.min2@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
NEW As specified in Section 5 of [RFC5880], BFD Echo packets may be spoofed. Specifically for Unaffiliated BFD Echo, a DoS attacker may
send spoofed Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets to the loop-back device,
so some form of authentication SHOULD be included.

I'm still not clear if you do or do not mean that B SHOULD
be able to validate whatever authentication is included. If
B doesn't check then it seems the DoS won't be mitigated, or
am I still confused?

Cheers,
S.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux