Hi, On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 01:46:41PM -0700, Barry Leiba via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Barry Leiba > Review result: Not Ready > > As this is documenting an existing algorithm that was not developed > in the IETF, we have no control over the substance of the document, > so I am not commenting on that: it is what it is. > > And that's exactly my issue with this: it's in the wrong stream. > The shepherd writeup says that it was not developed in the IETF and > there's no reason to put it on Standards Track, but also says that > there's no reason it "needs to go to the ISE". I disagree: this is > *exactly* the sort of document that the Independent stream is there for. > There is no meaningful sense of IETF consensus on this -- all we can > have is consensus to publish it as is. > > Ultimately, the IESG, not my review, will decide the right answer here. > Please consider asking the ISE to move this to the Independent stream, > where I think it should have been taken in the first place. Thanks. I also think that the Independant Stream would be a better fit for this document. Br, Erik -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
