Thank you Ned for the review of the draft.
We have addressed the Nits in the latest update.
HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-12.html
Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-12
Thanks,
Rakesh
From:
Smith, Ned <ned.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, September 20, 2024 at 2:05 PM
To: secdir@xxxxxxxx <secdir@xxxxxxxx>, iesg@xxxxxxxx <iesg@xxxxxxxx>, last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>, draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr.all@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: SecDir review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.
The summary of the review is: Ready
Note: Line 7 of the first paragraph of the Introduction may have a singular/plural agreement mismatch.
“ are used to steer traffic through a specific, user-defined paths”
R/through a specific,/through specific,
|
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
