Thank you Roni for the review of the draft.
FYI:
We have addressed your comments in the revised draft.
HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-12.html
Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-12
Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-12
Thanks again,
Rakesh
On Sun, Sep 1, 2024 at 11:46 PM Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sr-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2024-09-01
IETF LC End Date: 2024-09-06
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary:
The document is ready to be published as a standard track rFC with nits
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
In section 4.2.2 first paragraph “ the response messages are preferred to be
sent back in-band on the same link ” do you mean “the response messages SHOULD
be sent …”
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list -- mpls@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to mpls-leave@xxxxxxxx
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
