Hi Dirk, Thanks a lot for your review! We've just submitted -10, which shall have all your comments addressed: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-09&url2=draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag-10&difftype=--html On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:25 AM Dirk Von Hugo via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Dirk Von Hugo > Review result: Ready with Nits > > Dear all, > I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-pio-pflag. > These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area > Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just > like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve > them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more > details on the INT Directorate, see > https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/. > > I think the draft is of great value for better operational efficiency and very > well written. Thanks to the authors! In addition to points raised within SEC > and GEN reviews - I could only find some nits or IMHO useful clarifications as > listed below: > > p.1: > IA_NA => Identity Association for Non-temporary Addresses (IA_NA) > p.2: > Prefix Delegation => Prefix Delegation (PD) > VMs => Virtual Machines > p.3: > 15 devices connect => 15 devices have been connected > p.4: > ULA => ULA (Unique Local Address) > indicates that that the network => indicates that the network > as follows: => as follows (see Figure 1): > p.7: > this problem this is => this problem is > p.8: > rule 5 => Rule 5 of [RFC6724] > RFC-Mandated Behavior => RFC-Mandated Behaviour > p.9 (2x): > doesn't => does not > > Thanks and > Best regards > Dirk > > -- Cheers, Jen Linkova -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
