Hi Yaron,
thank you for your comments and suggestion adding the reference. Would the following address your concern:
NEW TEXT:
6. Security Considerations
This document introduces no new security considerations beyond those
outlined in Section 7 of [I-D.ietf-mpls-mna-fwk].
Regards,
Greg
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 6:39 AM Yaron Sheffer via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Yaron Sheffer
Review result: Has Issues
This document reviews multiple use cases for a new extension to MPLS, Network
Action Indicators.
The entirety of the Security Considerations section reads:
This document introduces no new security considerations.
I am not convinced, and I think an explanation is needed on why MNA are more or
less susceptible to attacks than the way these use cases are signaled today.
That *could* lead to discussion of new security controls.
Specifically I would recommend to address the more difficult migration and
coexistence scenarios listed in Sections 3 and 4.
In fact, even a reference to
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-10.html#name-security-considerations
may do the job, assuming the authors believe the Security Considerations over
in that document cover the use cases listed here.
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx