Michael Richardson wrote:
John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> See my most recent note (and Keith's and Geert's that preceded it and
> John Levine's recent one that followed it). Recent best practice
> suggesting that ssh is a better option for most applications on the
> main/public Internet is not sufficient justification for moving it to
> Historic, no matter how passionately you and some others feel about
> that, especially so because there is no standards-track definition
> for SSH.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/secsh/documents/
You are right. There isn't one RFC. There are 13.
And, from the SSH rfcs, rfc854 is referenced both informatively
and normatively.
Masataka Ohta
