On 2024-07-03, at 22:03, Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Linda, > > On 2024-06-10, at 19:59, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> While the document specifies using tag 999 >> to represent unknown application-extension identifiers, it does not provide >> strict rules on how an EDN consumer should handle such identifiers beyond >> preserving the information. It would be nice to have more specific error >> handling guidance. > > Thank you for pointing this out. > > We added text about this in [1], which is slated to be part of the next I-D revision. > > [1]: https://github.com/cbor-wg/edn-literal/pull/55/files … and apologies for forgetting to mention PR #48 [2], which adds some text for both 888 and 999 addressing the benefits of failing early on unknown tags and of using processing options to control the failing behavior. Grüße, Carsten [2]: https://github.com/cbor-wg/edn-literal/pull/48/files -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
