As the responsible AD, I have received an informal but valid IETF Last Call comment: while section 6 defines a clear taxonomy, the section 7 (OS current practices) does not use it 😉
Easy to fix but should be done
Regards
-éric
On 17/06/2024, 22:10, "iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx" <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2024-07-01. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
Internet users are becoming more aware that their activity over the
Internet leaves a vast digital footprint, that communications might
not always be properly secured, and that their location and actions
can be tracked. One of the main factors that eases tracking Internet
users is the wide use of long-lasting, and sometimes persistent,
identifiers at various protocol layers. This document focuses on MAC
addresses.
There have been several initiatives within the IETF and the IEEE 802
standards committees to overcome some of these privacy issues. This
document provides an overview of these activities to help
coordinating standardization activities in these bodies.
The file can be obtained via
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
