[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-bcp97bis-05.txt> (Procedure for Standards Track Documents to Refer Normatively to External Documents) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On May 12, 2024, at 4:47 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
< snip>
> 
> We did, in RFC 2026. This whole discussion is only a gloss on RFC 2026. When the IESG reaches a decision whether to advance a document, they have to judge whether the rules have been followed. I really don't see that the draft changes the rules in any fundamental way. It makes it harder to cite a paywalled draft, which is a good thing, but it doesn't forbid it, which would be self-defeating.
> 
> [The RFC 2026 rule is that "open standards" may be referenced, but its definition of "open standards" doesn't mention cost.]

of course, in the days of RFC 2026, you had to pay for essentially all "open standards" 

so that was assumed

Scott
-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux