[Last-Call] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-lamps-ocsp-nonce-update-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Jim Fenton
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the designated ARTART reviewer for this draft. This is a re-review of -06
following my review of -04.

Status: Ready with Nits

Thanks for addressing basically all of my comments from my earlier review. This
is ready to go, although I spotted a few more instances of the overuse of
"octets" in Section 2.1 that result in some awkward wording. Examples and
suggested replacements:

"...while the extnValue is the encoded value of Nonce octets" -> "...while the
extnValue is the encoded value of the nonce"

"...then the length of the Nonce octets MUST be..." -> "...then the length of
the nonce MUST be..."

"...MUST use a minimum length of 32 octets for Nonce octets in the Nonce
extension." -> "...MUST use a minimum length of 32 octets for the nonce in the
nonce extension."

"...that has a Nonce octets with a length..." -> "...that has a nonce with a
length..."

"The value of the Nonce octets MUST be..." -> "The value of the nonce MUST
be..."

"



-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux