This revision -16 properly handles my concerns. Bob and Gorry, thank you.
I would ballot Yes.
Behcet
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:16 PM Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We submitted a new version of <draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing> that we believe addresses the issues raised in the SECDIR, GENART, and TSVART reviews.
Bob & Gorry
> On Apr 30, 2024, at 12:03 PM, internet-drafts@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing-16.txt has been
> successfully submitted by Robert M. Hinden and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name: draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing
> Revision: 16
> Title: IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options Processing Procedures
> Date: 2024-04-30
> Group: 6man
> Pages: 22
> URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing-16.txt
> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing/
> HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing-16.html
> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing
> Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing-16
>
> Abstract:
>
> This document specifies procedures for how IPv6 Hop-by-Hop options
> are processed in IPv6 routers and hosts. It modifies the procedures
> specified in the IPv6 Protocol Specification (RFC 8200) to make
> processing of the IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options header practical with the
> goal of making IPv6 Hop-by-Hop options useful to deploy and use in
> the Internet. When published, this document updates RFC 8200.
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
