Re: [Last-Call] [lamps] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5990bis-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Russ, 




- Section A.1, step 2 - "Encrypt the random integer Z..."; shouldn't this be z
instead of Z. I see RFC 5099 used z. Why was that changed?

RFC 5990 uses both z and Z.

    Z = IntegerToString (z, nLen)


Dhruv: I understood that lowercase z is the integer, whereas Z is the string and since the text uses "random integer", I thought this ought to be z instead of Z. Am I wrong? 

In RFC 5990, you do math on z (e.g., c = z^e mod n).  I believe the same is true in rfc5990bis (e.g., z = ct^d mod n).


Dhruv: Looks like I am not able to explain myself. I created a PR instead - https://github.com/russhousley/rfc5990bis/pull/1

OLD:
2. Encrypt the random integer Z using the recipient's RSA
NEW:
2. Encrypt the random integer z using the recipient's RSA
END

In the initial highlighted text my concern was only with the use of "Z" instead of "z" when referring to it as a random integer. Note that at every other place you use z as well. 

Thanks!
Dhruv

 
Russ

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux