Re: How to judge what is the fair site for participation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Apr 15, 2024, at 10:26, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard=40huawei.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have already proven with simple Excel calculations that
> if the goal is "less disturbance for sleeping hours" (overlap between the typical sleeping time of the person with IETF meeting time)
> then all meetings should be in India
> for IETF 111 participant's distribution.

the difficulty here is not the in doing the math for a given optimization objective, it's agreeing to what that objective should be.

For example, "less disturbance for sleeping hours" might seem like a universally good objective at first glance. But certainly for some individuals, it's not. For example, in my case whether that objective is good depends on what else is going on in the family during that particular week - there are weeks where I'd rather do remote calls during my local nighttime. And there are other weeks where I don't.

There unfortunately are no easy solutions here.

Thanks,
Lars

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux