Hi Marc, thank you for your review. > Reviewer: Marc Blanchet > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I'm the assigned ART reviewer for this document. While I'm aware of IPSEC-IKE > and its use, I have no competency in this technology, therefore I have not verified > the substantive protocol specification itself. > > Comment 1) > The draft does not specify any fallback procedure or how to handle the situation > when no proper authentication method can be chosen by one of the peers. Maybe > it is specified elsewhere? Or maybe it is so obvious there is no point in saying? Or > it may be useful to specify some? The draft doesn't change the auth method selection mechanism from IKEv2. In particular - each party used whatever authentication method it thinks is appropriate to authenticate itself to the peer. The draft just helps each party not to select the method that is unsupported by the peer. > Nits: > 3.2.2 "If no Certificate Request payload were receives" s/receives/received/ ? Thank you, fixed in my local copy. Regards, Valery. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
