Hi Russ,
Thank you for your review.
On 08/03/2024 16:29, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote:
Yes, I think some text was copied.Reviewer: Russ Housley Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-messagelimit-08 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 2024-03-08 IETF LC End Date: 2024-03-25 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major Concerns: None Minor Concerns: This document contains the disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work. Is this because it builds upon the capability defined in RFC 3501? If so, then you can ignore this concern. If it is something else, then I would like to see a rationale in the document, even if it is put in a place that will not be part of the final RFC.
Nits:
IDnits reports:
** There are 13 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest
one being 23 characters in excess of 72.
At lease one of these long lines was a problem for me as a reader.
I suspect that all of the long lines are in the C:/S: examples.
I will sot this out with RFC Editor.I do not see the point of an Index at the back of the document that only has one entry.
Right, will remove.
Best Regards,
Alexey
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
