Re: [Last-Call] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Many thanks for confirming!

spt

> On Feb 24, 2024, at 16:11, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sean,
> 
> Thanks for the review. 
> 
> Regarding your second comment, yes, mobile satellites movements are pre-determined, and it's a TVR use case. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Yingzhen
> 
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 6:21 PM Sean Turner via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Reviewer: Sean Turner
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Hi! This is my second review of this I-D; I compared -04 to -05.  I had two
> points:
> 
> 1. Thanks for a greatly improved security considerations section. While it is
> still essentially empty, now readers will know why! ;)
> 
> Changing my review to "Ready" based on the changes to the security
> considerations.
> 
> 2. I am going to infer from the changes made in s5.3 (dropping the intro
> sentence and adding the sentence about the ground station) means that mobile
> satellites are not a non-deterministic scenario. But, it would be nice to
> confirm this. 
>  
> Cheers,
> spt
> 
> 

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux