Hi Lloyd,
I took a decision before and can revert it back when i see a real change, can give myself 3 more chances and i think it will be enough if same way of communication will not change, sorry i was busy to make the draft active, my mistake, will try
my best to participate actively and i hope i will not be late in replying due to the different time zone.
Khaled Omar
From: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 4:32:13 AM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ietf <IETF@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Adding IPv10 I-D to the IETF 119 meeting agenda
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 4:32:13 AM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ietf <IETF@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Adding IPv10 I-D to the IETF 119 meeting agenda
Khaled,
Your draft is not active, which is required for discussion
at a meeting, and you previously demanded
that your draft be withdrawn from the IETF.
Lloyd Wood
lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 24 Feb 2024, at 10:37, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dears,
Could you please give the green light to the IPv10 I-D to be discussed during the next IETF meeting.
You can guide me to the correct Work Group, if IntArea still fits, then please confirm.
Kind regards,Khaled OmarSenior Service Delivery EngineerDELL TechnologiesGet Outlook for iOS
