[Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-cose-typ-header-parameter-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Has Nits

Status: Ready with Nits

Nit 1: section 1, paragraph 1, last sentence.

When you refer to [RFC8725] for recommending "explicit typing" in section 1,
please add the section (3.11) in [RFC8725] that discusses the "explicit
typing." It would help the reader of this document easily cross-reference your
work.

Nit 2: Section 3, paragraph 1, first sentence.

Same comment as NIT 1.

NIT 3:  Section 3, paragraph 1, English sentence grammar

Perhaps you want a ":" instead of a ";".  If not, perhaps you want to break
this sentence into two sentences.

Old Text:/
   The case for explicit typing of COSE objects is equivalent to the
   case made for explicit typing in JSON Web Token Best Current
   Practices [RFC8725]; explicit typing can prevent confusion between
   different kinds of COSE objects./

Simple fix: /
   The case for explicit typing of COSE objects is equivalent to the
   case made for explicit typing in JSON Web Token Best Current
   Practices [RFC8725]: explicit typing can prevent confusion between
   different kinds of COSE objects./



-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux