> On Feb 17, 2024, at 11:00 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 18-Feb-24 00:00, Michael Welzl wrote: >> Dear Brian, >> I’ll leave it for others to publicly answer your items 1. and 2., but for 3., I wanted to say that we do have an overview of implementations; we thought it would fit best in the companion document that’s focused on implementation, so this is where it is: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-taps-impl-18.html#name-existing-implementations > > Thanks, that's great. If I have time, I'll look closely at PyTAPS. > > By the way, BCP205 states that the implementation status section is temporary and "The authors should include a note to the RFC Editor requesting that the section be removed before publication." Hard to believe as this may be, at the time we first added such a section (or discussed it), BCP205 was not a BCP. So much time has passed! So, sure, yes, we’ll do that; sorry for missing it! Cheers, Michael -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
