Re: [Last-Call] [Jmap] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-sieve-16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for your response.  Sounds like you will address all the issues I raised.

>> I was surprised that the Abstract did not include more text from Section 1.

>What text did you expect to see? I added a new sentence to the Abstract.

Most RFCs and drafts that I have seen duplicate the abstract into the introduction. I am not recommending you do that, just that your draft was unusual in my experience.


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux