Reviewer: Sean Turner Review result: Ready with Nits I-D Nits complains that the introduction and abstract should indicate that this I-D updates RFC 5652. Yeah this is a nit: In s2, should this: The originator establishes the CEK using these steps: be replaced by this: The originator establishes the CEK (or CAEK) using these steps: because the processing overview addresses both (see s1). Actually do the "or CEAK" in the rest of the section too? See: https://github.com/lamps-wg/cms-kemri/pull/11 -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
