Re: [Last-Call] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-sids-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Juan Carlos. I will add a sentence about the prefix allocation into the Introduction as well.

Regards
Suresh

> On Jan 30, 2024, at 5:10 PM, Juan-Carlos Zúñiga via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Juan-Carlos Zúñiga
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> Reviewer: Juan Carlos Zuniga
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-ietf-6man-sids>. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
> Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
> would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along
> with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on
> the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.
> 
> Based on my review, if I were on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO
> OBJECTION.
> 
> Summary: The document is intended to explain the use of SRv6 SIDs within 
> the IPv6 Addressing Architecture.
> 
> Major issues: None.
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Abstract/Introduction:
> The Abstract mentions briefly that the document allocates a Global Unicast
> Prefix for SIDs. This is not mentioned in the Introduction though. Since this is 
> a major contribution of the document, I suggest adding some more text in the 
> Introduction about the usefulness of this allocation.
> 
> Best, 
> 
> Juan Carlos 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux