Given that this was/is a 3GPP protocol, I'm not sure moving it to
Proposed Standard makes sense, regardless of the EMU related work that
triggered this. My understanding is that PS status definitely means
that the IETF owns change control over the protocol.
Is 3GPP willing to cede change control to the IETF?
Later, Mike
On 1/31/2024 4:08 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Giving the significant EAP-AKA', it is a good idea to elevate RFC 9048 to the standards track.
Russ
On Jan 31, 2024, at 3:30 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
While discussing another draft, The IESG review ended up considering a status change:
- RFC9048 from Informational to Proposed Standard
(Improved Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3GPP Mobile
Network Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA'))
The supporting document for this request can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-uplift-eap-akaquote-to-ps/
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2024-02-28. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The affected document can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9048/
IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-uplift-eap-akaquote-to-ps/ballot/
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
